NOTICE

• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

To avoid main different people astray, please don't seek advice from videos using the host title youtube.com or its aliases. Instead, make a hyperlink to invidio.us or one of many associated proxy sites. Lead people to what is nice, not to what is dangerous! Just ensure that not to decide on a proxy that's "protected" by Cloudflare, since that sends its personal nonfree software program. This way of referring might be fail-secure: it could stop to work, but it'll most likely not begin leading individuals to run nonfree software program. There can also be a Firefox add-on to bypass that Javascript code. IceCat comes with that add-on by default. But that will not overcome the blockage of access by way of Tor. If Google defeats the invidio.us proxies, I can ell you the way I will not reply. I cannot surrender to youtube's nonfree software program and surveillance. I enjoy having access to the music and video there, however I cannot do foolish or desperate things to keep that entry. You should not both! You don't need a particular "platform" to put up an audio or video on the internet. You possibly can publish an audio or video file on any internet site. Just put the file on the site and hyperlink to it as if it had been an ordinary page. All graphical browsers can handle that.Google censored set up of Samsung's ad-blocker, saying that blocking ads is "interference" with the sites that publicize (and surveil users by way of adverts). The advert-blocker is proprietary software, identical to this system (Google Play) that Google used to deny entry to put in it. I might refuse to have either of them on my computer. Using a nonfree program gives the owner power over you, and Google has exercised that power.

Surveillance

To establish your self to a Google service is a grave error. - Google shops a list of all purchases a person has made that in any approach point out the consumer's a gmail account. A consumer can delete purchases from this list, but only one purchase at a time. Then that purchase disappears from the listing that the user sees. Whether it stays in another checklist, we have no idea, however I'd expect Google to answer that query with doubletalk. The article talks about what Google cites as its motive for doing this, however the motive is irrelevant - because it is not an excuse.- Google's alarm system, "Nest Secure", turns out to have contained a microphone all along - however only just lately started listening.- Google "sanitizes" its whole search logs, then publishes them; however it declines to explain the technique of "sanitization", and there may be proof that customers might be tracked by them.

The article additionally mentions two-factor authentication, which in and of itself might be a helpful method (though I've read that crackers can now defeat it), however has the flaw of requiring a mobile phone. My rule #2 for digital safety is not to have a cell phone.

- Gmail was planned from the beginning as a large surveillance system, to make psychological profiles not solely of Gmail users but of everyone who sends mail to Gmail users.- Google quietly combined its ad-tracking profiles with its browsing profiles.- Google has found a means to trace most bank card purchases within the US, even these not finished through a cellphone, and correlate that with people's online actions.

Google can't do either aspect to me, since I pay cash and don't carry a mobile phone, and it would not know what internet sites I look at.

- Google Play sends app developers the non-public particulars of customers that install the app. Merely asking customers' "consent" for this is not sufficient to legitimize that. We know that almost all customers have given up on studying just what they are "consenting" to, and the reason is that they're accustomed to being informed, "If you'd like to use this service, you should consent to blah blah blah." To truly protect individuals's privateness, we must cease Google (and different companies) from getting this private data in the primary place!- Google shops a huge quantity of data on every person. This could include, in addition to the consumer's search history and advertising profile: - A timeline of the user's location throughout each day- Data on the utilization of non-Google cellphone apps- 'Deleted' emails and files uploaded to Google Drive

Facebook and Google joined with ISPs to defeat a privateness initiative in California. Collecting the many ways Google is involved with US authorities surveillance, abroad and in the US, quantities to fairly a package.

Google invitations folks to let Google monitor their cellphone use, and all web use in their homes, for an extravagant cost of $20.

This malicious performance will not be a secondary aspect of a program with some other purpose; this is the software program's sole function, and Google says so. But Google says it in a way that encourages most people to ignore the main points and remain unaware of the extent of the spying. Anyway, mere consent does not legitimize large surveillance.

Amazon and Google need "good" devices to report all exercise to them.

In other phrases, when you have a "good" (learn "spy") lightbulb with that proposed feature, and tell an Amazon or Google listening system about it, thenceforth any time you switched it on or off no matter how, it could ship a report back to Amazon or Google.

Even right now, the one technique to make "sensible" products secure is to make sure they can not connect with anyone else's methods.

Another piece of Google's surveillance capitalism: when stores mail receipts to a gmail.com account, Google figures out and information who purchased what.

I believe that the store itself shouldn't get this information, porno fetish which is why I always pay money and never give my name.

*Google faces lawsuit over monitoring in apps even when users opted out.*

Terms of Service

- Google cuts off accounts for customers that resell Pixel telephones. They lose access to all of their mail and documents saved in Google servers underneath that account. It ought to be illegal to place any "terms of service" on a bodily product. It should also be illegal to close an account on a service without letting the consumer download whatever was stored there. These occasions provide another purpose why schools should by no means ask a scholar to use a service account linked to the student's name.

Censorship

- Amazon and Google have minimize off domain-fronting, a function used to allow folks in tyrannical international locations to succeed in communication systems which can be banned there.- French blogger Claims YouTube Tried to Censor Juncker Interview.- Google has agreed to perform particular censorship of Youtube for the federal government of Pakistan, deleting views that the state opposes. This will assist the illiberal Pakistani state suppress dissent.

- Youtube's "content ID" mechanically deletes posted movies in a way copyright legislation doesn't require.- YouTube has made private offers with the copyright business to censor works which can be honest use. More info.

- Google shut off Alexa O'Brien's Google Drive account, denying her access to it, because her reporting on Chelsea Manning's trial included copies of al-Qa'ida propaganda that was presented as proof.- Google is deleting porn artists' porn movies from their very own private accounts, quietly and mysteriously.

Never trust a remote storage company to keep something but a spare backup copy. When you store that, put your recordsdata into an archive and encrypt it so that the corporate cannot tell what's in them - not even their file names.

- Vox lawyers obtained Youtube to take down criticisms of a video published by Vox, and threaten the critics with punishment, too.

The videos were virtually absolutely truthful use, however Youtube decided towards the critics anyway. This reveals how Youtube's normal submission to the copyright industry constrict's folks's rights.

Miscellaneous

- Google is a tax dodger. Of course, it is not the only one, but that is not any excuse.- Google supports the TPP because of three principally-evil provisions that will benefit Google.- Google has made it in order that Chrome now routinely installs the DRM module. This makes it harmful for safety researchers within the US to investigate attainable insecurity in Chrome. More information.- Support is growing for reverting US antitrust law to what it was earlier than Reagan weakened it. That's the reason Google is using its influence to weaken those who campaign towards this.

How I Got Fired From a D.C. Think Tank for Fighting Against the ability of Google.

- Google informed a reporter in 2011 that web pages with out "+1" buttons would be punished with decrease search rankings. When she published a narrative in Forbes about that, Google pressured Forbes to take it down.